



Learning Environments Must Break Through the Silos that Separate Learning from the Real World | |
The paper, 21st Century Learning Environments, finds that learning environments – the structures, tools, and communities that inspire students and educators to attain the knowledge and skills that are required of them – must embrace a diverse and complex world of people, places, and ideas. While a tremendous amount of attention has been paid to standards, assessments, professional development, and curriculum and instruction, the paper finds that learning environments are an essential component to supporting positive 21st century outcomes for students.
The report notes that the term ‘learning environment’ has traditionally suggested a concrete place (schools, classrooms, libraries, etc.), but in today’s interconnected and technology-driven world, a learning environment can be virtual, online and remote. In addition, physical learning structures must be designed to suit the immediate and future requirements of a community and should enable collaboration, interaction and information sharing among community members.
While the relationship of physical spaces and technological systems to learning continues to be ever important, even more important is how – and whether – these environments support the positive human relationships that matter most to learning, according to the report. The most essential element of all learning environments has always been the ‘people network’ – the community of students, educators, parents, business and civic leaders, and policymakers that constitute the human resources of an education system.
“It is critical that 21st century learning environments address the multiple and interconnected needs of the whole child,” said Paige Kuni, worldwide manager of K-12 education for Intel Corporation and chair of the Partnership for 21st Century Skills. “Learning supports are only valuable if they effectively reinforce human relationships, give relevance to learning and encourage student engagement. Schools must devote themselves to more than the mind-body connection to ensure student achievement.”
Likewise, technology must go beyond merely supporting instruction to help foster personal connections to ensure students have the necessary foundations to become successful 21st century citizens. Toward that end, technology can enhance student learning and promote mastery of 21st century skills – learning and innovation skills, core subjects and 21st century themes, life and career skills and information, media and technology skills – by promoting greater student achievement, increasing student engagement, assessing student performance, facilitating communication and collaboration and maximizing administrative effectiveness.
The paper notes that the greatest challenge to incorporating technology into learning environments is not finding time and money, but finding ways to adequately support the use of these tools. Technology can only make a difference when students, teachers, and administrators are provided the necessary supports to proficiently integrate it into daily routines. Educational technology is most valuable when it functions as part of a thoughtfully orchestrated system that includes effective curriculum and instruction, ongoing professional development, authentic assessments and a positive learning culture.
“Schools are being designed for a new balance that combines the best of traditional classroom learning with leading 21st century learning methods and tools,” said Bernie Trilling, global director of education strategy and partnerships for the Oracle Education Foundation. “The learning environments of the 21st century will encompass a powerful mix of face-to-face learning opportunities with digital connections to bridge cultures and blend virtual and real-life relationships. At the same time, federal, state and local policies must help guide the creation of learning environments that serve all students in every corner of our states.”
With tight budgets and worries over the economy, policymakers face tough decisions concerning whether school design really makes a difference, notes the report. According to Georgetown University researchers, design has a bearing on achievement, as test scores can increase by up to 11 percent by improving a school’s physical environment. With that in mind, school design must also effectively address increasing enrollment, which is estimated to grow at record levels though 2013. This, in turn, signals that total spending on construction and maintenance could be as much as $30 billion annually. This is not an unprecedented occurrence – faced with similar demands a century ago, policymakers built thousands of schools that mimicked industrial forms to fulfill increased enrollment.
While, today, many schools have advanced well beyond those outdated models and classrooms have become undeniably more flexible, colorful and engaging, this is just an initial step, cautions the report. Successful learning environments must be able to adapt to the constantly evolving and ever-changing nature of technology, teaching and learning. One solution to achieve this necessary flexibility is to design learning environments that incorporate movable furniture and walls that can be made to conform to different class sizes and subjects.
"As important as it is for physical structures to be adaptable, it is even more important that class time be elastic. Instead of assigning a certain amount of time for teaching one subject per day, teachers need the flexibility of bigger and more adjustable time slots to truly impact learning," said Charles Fadel, global lead for education for Cisco Systems. "There must be a renewed focus on increasing the quality of teaching by providing teachers more time and opportunities to plan, collaborate and work with advanced technology systems."
In addition, schools cannot continue to use seat time as a measure of academic attainment. Rather, assessment of learning must include thoughtful measures of a student’s ability to apply and demonstrate knowledge in complex situations, the report concludes.
Four education leaders call on Congress to meet President-elect Obama's request to target classroom technology modernization in economic recovery legislation.
By DIANA DILLABER MURRAY
Of The Oakland Press
PONTIAC — The Pontiac school board has put the school district on the fast track in what is becoming a statewide competition to create a Promise Zone that would guarantee graduates a college education.
The board voted Friday at a brief special meeting to schedule a public hearing at 5:30 p.m. Feb. 5 at the urging of state Rep. Tim Melton, D-Auburn Hills, who said only 10 Promise Zones — similar to the one created in Kalamazoo — will be authorized throughout the state.
Melton sponsored the Promise Zone legislation with Pontiac School District in mind, and it was signed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm this week. Melton and Granholm are expecting the Pontiac district to be the first Promise Zone in the state, he said.
Board Vice President Gill Garrett, and trustees Robert Bass and Karen Cain all had questions and concerns about the process and the details of how the Promise Zone will work.
But the board agreed to schedule the public hearing to start the process immediately with the commitment of Melton to provide the answers to all their questions during the 20-day period leading up to the hearing. The process will go no further than the hearing without approval of the board.
“This is an exciting opportunity for the city and the district,” Melton said, explaining that the promise of a college education would bring more families and businesses into the district and increase property values and the tax base the way it did in Kalamazoo.
“As I drafted the bill, Pontiac was number one in my concern. The number one reason kids don’t go to college is money,” Melton said. A district is eligible to be a Promise Zone if the youth poverty rate is above the state average and the district qualifies, he said. The state Department of Treasury accepts or rejects the applications.
Melton said once children know tuition will be paid, they begin planning and expecting to continue with education after high school.
“In the second grade in Kalamazoo, colleges begin recruiting kids. They know they are going to college. The psyche starts changing. Interest in high school goes up.”
Under the legislation, the school board would create a Promise Zone Authority board and appoint nine of the 11 members. The other two would be appointed by the speaker of the House and the leader of the Senate majority. The authority would cover full tuition to any public school in Michigan and a capped amount to any more expensive private Michigan college.
The Promise Zone Authority board would set the criteria — such as the required gradepoint average — for the scholarships and would be responsible for raising money in the private sector to fund them. No school board members would be on the authority.
In the third year, after two years of fund raising, the state would authorize the district to keep a percentage of funds generated by property tax growth to put toward scholarships. Children in all the cities and townships in the district would benefit, not just those who live in Pontiac. And the fund would reap revenue from growth in property taxes from all the entities in the school district.
Bass, Garrett and Cain said they are concerned and disappointed the board would not have any part in decision making, such as setting the criteria that makes a student eligible. That would be entirely the authority’s role.
“I want to make sure our students can take advantage of it,” Bass said.
As far as Melton is concerned, he said, “I think the criteria should be (a free college education) for any student who graduates high school,” which is the criteria set in Kalamazoo.
Melton said the school board will have some influence because they interview and select the members of the authority. School attorney George Pitchfork said trustees will also have the right to remove authority members.
Pitchford also advised the board that they could have a trustee on the authority as a nonvoting member to provide input from the board and to keep trustees up to date on the authority’s activities.
One thing that was worrisome to Bass is the fact that students and their parents would have to show they did their best to obtain other scholarships and grants before the Promise Zone fund would cover the difference.
Contact staff writer Diana Dillaber Murray at (248) 745-4638 or diana.dillaber@oakpress.com.
DAVID KILKENNEY/Special to the Free Press
Linda Paramore, acting superintendent of the Pontiac School District, addresses residents last month at one of several forums. The district may be forced to close and combine some schools due to declining enrollment.
Pontiac schools redesign plan nears
Final forum scheduled to get feedback
BY MELANIE D. SCOTT • FREE PRESS STAFF WRITER • January 4, 2009
Ellen Logan said she was looking forward to sending her youngest child, 13-year-old Tyler, to Pontiac Northern High School in the fall.
But that changed when Logan found out Pontiac School District officials were planning to redesign the district and possibly close one high school, making students from Northern and Pontiac Central attend the same school.
"I'm not sure what to do," Logan said. "I have some safety concerns because the schools are rivals, but I want to hear their plans before I make any decisions."
Declining enrollment and budget constraints have prompted Pontiac School District officials also to consider closing about half of all school buildings, including some middle and elementary schools. The district wants to reconfigure its schools to a save a yet-to-be determined amount of money. The redesign is expected to happen sometime this school year, said Georgette Johnson, the district's director of communications.
School officials expect to host the district's fourth and final public forum about the redesign plan Jan. 13 at the district's Whitmer Human Resource Center to allow parents and community leaders to talk about the plan. Three forums have been held since November.
"If we are going to save this school district, we are going to have to work together," acting Superintendent Linda Paramore said.
The redesign comes as district officials say there will be a projected $10-million deficit during the 2009-10 school year. There were nearly 8,000 students enrolled at the end of the 2007-08 school year. This year, there are 6,700 students in the district, which has space for nearly 20,000 students.
District officials are considering offering kindergarten through eighth grade under one roof. Another plan would change the current elementary school configuration to kindergarten through sixth grade, while middle school would include seventh through ninth grade and the high school would have 10th through 12th grades.
The district created an advisory committee in October to examine the redesign. Two advisory subcommittees were formed to look at proposed changes in the district's instruction as well as facilities and finance.
After hearing the feedback at all of the forums, the advisory committee will make its redesign recommendation to district officials. After hearing the recommendation, district officials will announce a plan.
"This needs to continue to happen," said Denise Morgan, a social studies teacher at Bethune Academy. "I think it's wonderful to get parents, teachers and the district talking. We are all in this together."
Officials say they believe the second forum had the most participants with more than 200 people in attendance.
"We don't think enough parents have been out," said Paramore. "If they don't come, I don't know where they will get the information from. We want to see more people."
Contact MELANIE D. SCOTT at 248-351-3681 or mdscott@freepress.com.
The salute from the Center for Digital Education, a national research institute, is a surprising and welcome break from the endless economic downers cascading our way. It could help Michigan attract high-tech employers and, longer term, even bring some stability to the state’s economy if the students who are now gaining increased access to critical computer learning stick around long enough for Michigan employers to benefit from their added skills. For now, state education leaders should plan to build on the national validation of a determined effort to link students to more competitive and creative learning opportunities. Gov. Jennifer Granholm and the Legislature clearly made a wise move two years ago by including online learning as a component of tougher high school graduation requirements. The other jewel in Michigan’s online learning crown is the rapid growth of the Michigan Virtual School, where middle and high school students can sign up for courses ranging from algebra to Mandarin Chinese and make up missed assignments. While just over 500 schools make use of the service, there’s plenty of room for Michigan to do more. The most obvious option is exploring ways to widen access to include students beyond those who are either academically gifted or have special needs. None of this is to suggest an end to classroom learning. That’s still the way most people will get most of their schooling for the foreseeable future. But given how mightily Michigan is struggling to dent its dropout numbers, expanded virtual learning should be a broader option. Boredom in the classroom is consistently the main reason given for students who walk away from high school. Expanded online learning could be one way of recharging those students before they are permanently disconnected from education. | |||
PAUL LACHINE/Special to the Free Press |